Ho, Ho, No! Why iPads And iPhones Are Not Kids’ Toys

November 23rd, 2011

Cell phones and iPads rank as the most-wanted gifts of the season among youngsters, with 65% placing these devices at the top of their wish lists, according to SodaHead.com, a discussion community with more than 10 million visitors a month.

 

Posted in Information | No Comments »

Dr. Davis critiques BMJ “no-link” study

November 15th, 2011

Posted in Information | No Comments »

Cell Phones: Myth or Fact?

November 15th, 2011

MYTH:

The World Health Organization (WHO) statement does not mean cell phones cause cancer, because it is based on limited evidence.

FACT:

Thirty-one highly acclaimed members of the International Agency of Research on Cancer (IARC), a WHO committee, voted in a nearly unanimous decision after detailed examination of this data.  In their expert opinion, cell phone radiation, also known as microwave radiation,  is in the same rank as many things you would never let your child play with, including  jet and diesel fuel and some chlorinated pesticides like DDT and Kepone.

The WHO determined that “radiofrequency radiation and electromagnetic fields”warranted a 2b classification “as a “possible carcinogen,” based on an exhaustive examination of peer-reviewed, published epidemiology studies, industry-funded Interphone studies, and hundreds of scientific papers.

They concluded that human studies consistently found that with more than 10 years of use (with 30 minutes a day considered as high use), there is a significantly increased risk of glioma, a lethal brain tumor.  The WHO explicitly rejected the recent negative and widely publicized study from Denmark on brain cancer and cell phones in the British Medical Journal because it lacked detailed information on phone use and the power to find any change in risk.

MYTH:

“There is no known biological mechanism for cell phone radiation to cause cancer.” (Implication:  The data must be wrong.)

FACT:

This statement implies that science understands the underlying mechanisms through which cancer arises in all instances.  In the history of science, it often takes decades before a mechanism is understood.  We do not fully understand the biological mechanism through which tobacco causes lung cancer.  The experimental and human data reviewed by the WHO were substantial enough to bring them to an almost unanimous decision regarding this classification of cell phone radiation as a possible cause of cancer.

MYTH:

“If cell phones were really causing brain tumors, with so many people using them, we should be seeing an increase in brain tumor incidence, and we are not.”

FACT:

Many doctors report that they are seeing an increase in brain tumors in younger persons in their own practices.  Because more than 70% of all brain cancer occurs in persons over age 60, the overall age-adjusted rate of brain cancer reflects chiefly what has happened in older persons.  From other research we know that the average latency period between exposure and development of a glioma is 20 to 30 years (similar to all solid tumors such as lung cancer).  Studies of smokers find no increase in risk just ten years after most have begun to smoke.

A trivial segment of the population was using cell phones three decades ago, when cell phones were introduced to the US marketplace in 1983.  Most Americans did not begin using them routinely until the late 1990s.  Thus we are only seeing the tip of the iceberg now, with gliomas in early adopters.  But many others will be coming up on 20 years of use soon, and there may be a surge in gliomas around 2018.  Those who begin using cell phones as teenagers have a four to five-fold increased risk of brain tumors in less than a decade, according to studies carried out by Swedish physician-researcher Lennart Hardell.

In 2010 there was a significant increase in cancer of the brain and nervous system of Latinos, a group that uses phones more heavily.  Also, in the U.S., Norway, and Finland, there has been a rise in brain cancer in 20-29 year olds; the same subgroup that does not use a landline and has been using cell phones as teenagers.

MYTH:

“The FDA, ACS and FCC say cell phones are safe.”

FACT:

As Judge Alsup recently noted in his opinion, “The FCC has never said that RF radiation poses no danger at all only that RF radiation can be set at acceptable levels. “ Websites from these groups all include information on keeping phones at a safe distance from the body, as do fine print warnings that manufacturers provide.   Formerly, the ACS claimed there was no evidence linking brain tumors to cell phones.  Since the WHO classification, the
American Cancer Society notes that it’s sensible to take precautions with children and states, “the bottom line is the evidence is enough to warrant concern….”
In fact, the FCC and FDA advise that cell phones are safe ONLY IF HELD A CERTAIN DISTANCE FROM THE BODY.  THE FCC REQUIRES THIS SAFETY DISTANCE DATA TO BE IN EVERY MANUAL.  Currently this data is being hidden in fine-print warnings in user manuals that few read.

MYTH:

“The 2b classification labeling cell phones as a possible carcinogen is the same classification as pickled vegetables, talcum powder and coffee.”

FACT:

This is an attempt to dismiss the seriousness of this determination and mislead the public. The statement is correct and is not to be taken lightly.  Diets high in highly salted vegetables in China are tied with unusual increases in esophageal cancer.  Rates of this cancer have fallen when people stopped eating these foods.   Talcum powder was known to be contaminated with asbestos in some instances, which is why it increased cancer risk in long term users.
Like many chemotherapy agents, coffee can cause urinary tract cancer, while also lowering the risk of colon cancer.  The talc in talcum powder for years was heavily contaminated with asbestos which increases the risk of ovarian cancer.  Other major workplace hazards are also on this list of 2B carcinogens and remain the subject of major regulatory attention, including pesticides like DDT and Kepone, industrial materials such as PBBs, carbon black and carbon tetrachloride, and jet and diesel fuel, and mercury.

MYTH:

“The Interphone study showed no link between cell phones and brain tumors.”

FACT:

Not true.   The overall absence of risk is due to the fact that the average user in this study used a phone for less than eight years, and that a user was defined as someone who made one call a week for six months.  Because overall exposures were so low and limited, it is not surprising that there is no overall increase in risk.  But in the heaviest users in the Interphone study, a doubled or greater risk is evident.  This is why the IARC review considered the Interphone study as evidence of increased risk.

MYTH:

“This will never be as serious as tobacco.”

FACT:

This is potentially far worse than tobacco.  We never had 100% of people smoking, but we do have nearly all people using cell phones today.  Six billion people, including children, use cell phones regularly—some exclusively as landlines are abandoned—with considerable exposure.  We do not have the same scientific foundation for understanding cell phone radiation as we had for tobacco and lung cancer for two reasons:  The telecom industry has intentionally blocked studies, and it is more difficult to get funding now because of the economic downturn and the lack of training and funding in this field.
EHT urges that we take prudent steps now to reduce exposures while research begins to ask serious questions and programs are begun to train scientists and engineers in the field of bioelectromagnetics.

About Environmental Health Trust

 

Environmental Health Trust (EHT) educates individuals, health professionals and communities about controllable environmental health risks and policy changes needed to reduce those risks. Current multi-media projects include: local and national campaigns to ban smoking and asbestos; working with international physician and worker safety groups to warn about the risks of inappropriate use of diagnostic radiation and cell phones, promoting research and awareness of environmental causes of breast cancer, and building environmental wellness programs in Wyoming and Pennsylvania to address the environmental impacts of energy development, the built environment and radon. EHT was created with the goal of promoting health and preventing disease one person, one community and one nation at a time.  Chaired by Ronald B. Herberman, MD, a distinguished cancer biologist, the foundation’s website offers clear, science-based information to prevent environmentally based disease and promote health, for the general public, children, and health professionals. For more information about getting involved in the numerous special projects spearheaded by the EHT, please log on to www.ehtrust.org.

Posted in Information | 1 Comment »

Environmental Health Trust Reveals Risky Patterns of Cell Phone Use by Middle Schoolers

November 9th, 2011

 

Important New Zealand paper and UK Charity MobileWise Scientific Review:  Cell Phone Use Today Places Children At Risk Cited Among Several Reports

BERKELEY, CA – November 9, 2011 – Key figures in the arena of cell phone safety spoke today at a California City Council education forum in Berkeley.  The impact of cell phones on children was a major theme of the day’s speeches.  Devra Davis, PhD, MPH, founder of Environmental Health Trust (EHT), cited several studies, including a recent report that EHT coauthored, on radiofrequency exposure among children. She also highlighted an important new New Zealand study led by Mary Redmayne finding that in-pocket use of cell phones by middle schoolers exposes their reproductive organs’ to prolonged exposure to cell phone radiation.  Additionally, she unveiled an important new UK report that calls for interventions to protect children from the long-term health risks of cell phone radiation.

Cell Phones and Children’ Heads

According to the EHT report, children absorb twice as much microwave radiation from cell phones as adults, and radiation from cell phones carried in shirts or pants pockets is four to seven times higher than the guidelines set by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which determines exposure guidelines in the United States.

The reason for the discrepancy, EHT says, is that the process to determine radiation exposure from cell phones involves the use of a mannequin model that approximates a 6-foot 2-inch tall, 220-pound man.  Because this model head represents only about three percent of the population, the test will not accurately predict the radiation exposure of the other 97 percent, including children, nor does it estimate exposures from pocket use.

“The standard for cell phones has been developed based on old science, old models and old assumptions about how we use cell phones, and that’s why they need to change and protect our children and grandchildren,” said Dr. Davis.

Cell Phones and Sperm Damage

Dr. Davis also cited a New Zealand study led by researcher Mary Redmayne of the School of Geography, Environment and Earth Science at Victoria University in Wellington.   Redmayne found that a majority of New Zealand adolescents carry a cell phone switched on in their pants pocket for more than six hours a day.  Even where schools ban phones, more than two in five middle schoolers regularly sent texts from within a side pocket; a fifth carried one for more than 10 hours a day, and used it in-pocket.  Research suggests this may impair future fertility and/or reproductive integrity.

According to the study, 43% of student participants admitted to breaking rules about cell phone use.  A high-exposure group of risk-takers was identified for whom prohibited in-school use was positively associated with high texting rates, carrying the phone switched-on for more than 10 hours/day, and using them in-pocket.

The Redmayne team concluded that fertility research in humans finds important time and dose-dependent deleterious effects from cell phone exposure on sperm.  Genotoxic effects have been demonstrated from “non-thermal” exposures, but not consistently.  According to the study, there is sufficient evidence and expert opinion to warrant an enforced school policy removing cell phones from students during the day and promoting precautionary policies.

In response to the study’s findings, fertility expert, Ken McNatty, PhD, DSc, FRSNZ, a Professor of Cell Biology and Biotechnology at Victoria University of Wellington, NZ said “Doctors need to start asking patients with fertility problems about their cell phone use. It’s long been known that infertility in males or females can be caused by DNA damage to sperm or eggs, through exposure to X-irradiation or industrial chemicals.  Now there is evidence to suggest that cell phone microwaves also cause DNA damage to sperm in a time- and dose-dependent manner.”

New Report Calls for More Safety

Dr. Davis also spoke about a new report published today by UK charity MobileWise, warning that children’s health is being jeopardized by the failure of government and phone companies to respond to the growing body of evidence linking cell phone use with health hazards.  Dr. Davis and other public health experts working with MobileWise are calling on government and industry to respond to the new evidence, and to provide warnings and advice on ways to reduce the risk of health damage when using cell phones, especially for children.

 

The new report, “Mobile Phone Health Risks: The Case for Action to Protect Children,” brings together for the first time more than 200 peer-reviewed studies from a range of research institutions linking cell phones to serious health problems.  These include brain tumors and potential damage to fertility, genes, the blood-brain barrier and melatonin production, as well as other biological effects thought to have a role in the development of cancer.  Endorsed by a number of eminent doctors and scientists, the report highlights the growing and substantial body of evidence that has been obscured in the debate over these risks.

“It is better to be cautious now than it is to be sorry later,” said Dr. Davis.  “We have learned this because of previous experience involving substances and products that were used indiscriminately for a long time until the health effects became undeniable.  We do not want to see a future generation have to deal with fertility issues that can result from damage to sperm as well as female reproductive health.   We want our children and grandchildren to have the right to produce healthy offspring when and if they chose to do so.”

The studies cited are all available on www.saferphonezone.com

About Environmental Health Trust

Environmental Health Trust (EHT) educates individuals, health professionals and communities about controllable environmental health risks and policy changes needed to reduce those risks. Current multi-media projects include: local and national campaigns to ban smoking and asbestos; working with international physician and worker safety groups to warn about the risks of inappropriate use of diagnostic radiation and cell phones, promoting research and awareness of environmental causes of breast cancer, and building environmental wellness programs in Wyoming and Pennsylvania to address the environmental impacts of energy development, the built environment and radon. EHT was created with the goal of promoting health and preventing disease one person, one community and one nation at a time. Capitalizing on growing public interest in Dr. Devra Lee Davis’s three popular books, When Smoke Ran Like Water, a National Book Award Finalist, The Secret History of the War on Cancer, and Disconnect–The Truth about Cell Phone Radiation, What Industry Has Done to Hide It and How to Protect Your Family, as well as recent documentary films, the foundation’s website offers clear, science-based information to prevent environmentally based disease and promote health, for the general public, children, and health professionals. For more information about getting involved in the numerous special projects spearheaded by the EHT, please log on to www.ehtrust.org.


A summary of the study can be seen here.

 

Posted in Information, News | 1 Comment »

Presentation from Nov. 8 Berkeley event now online!

November 8th, 2011

These slides are the property of EHT. Please do not use without permission. 

Access the powerpoint slides here.

Posted in Featured, Information | 2 Comments »

Increasing Brain Cancer Incidence in Finland and Norway

November 1st, 2011

Click each image to enlarge.

Download full PDF here.

Download full PDF here.

Posted in Information, News | 3 Comments »

Infographic: How to reduce your cancer risk

October 16th, 2011

 

Click twice to enlarge.

Created by: ToughCell Phone Insurance

Posted in Information | 3 Comments »

New study shows cell phones exceed FCC exposure limits by as much as double for children

October 16th, 2011

A scholarly article on cell phone safety published online October 17, 2011, in the journal Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine reports the finding that cell phones used in the shirt or pants pocket exceed FCC exposure guidelines and that children absorb twice as much microwave radiation from phones as do adults.

The paper, titled “Exposure Limits:  The underestimation of absorbed cell phone radiation, especially in children,” notes that the industry-designed process for evaluating microwave radiation from phones results in children absorbing twice the cellphone radiation to their heads, up to triple in their brain’s hippocampus and hypothalamus, greater absorption in their eyes, and as much as 10 times more in their bone marrow when compared to adults.

The paper’s authors include three team members at Environmental Health Trust:  Devra Davis, PhD, MPH, Founder and President; L. Lloyd Morgan, Senior Science Fellow; and Ronald B. Herberman, MD, Chairman of the Board.

The existing process is based on a large man whose 40 brain tissues are assumed to be exactly the same.  A far better system relies on anatomically based models of people of various ages, including pregnant women, that can determine the absorbed radiation in all tissue types, and can account for the increased absorption in children.  It allows for cell phones to be certified with the most vulnerable users in mind—children—consistent with the “As Low As Reasonably Achievable” (ALARA) approach taken in setting standards for using radiological devices.

In the United States, the FCC determines maximum allowed exposures. Many countries, especially European Union members, use the “guidelines” of the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), a non-governmental agency.

Three additional authors contributed to the paper:  Om P. Gandhi, ScD, of the Department of Electrical Engineering at the University of Utah; Alvaro Augusto de Salles, PhD, of the Electrical Engineering Department at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul in Brazil; and Yueh-Ying Han, PhD, of the Department of Epidemiology and Community Health at New York Medical College.  Drs. Gandhi and De Salles serve on EHT’s Scientific Advisory Group.

 

Click here to a view a summary of the paper

 

Posted in Featured, Information, News | No Comments »

Press Release: Environmental Health Trust Responds to CTIA’s Lawsuit to Prevent San Francisco’s “Right to Know” Ordinance from Taking Effect

October 11th, 2011

EHT Founder Says Wireless Industry Group’s Action Unjustified

JACKSON, WY — October 11, 2011 – Devra Davis, PhD, MPH, President of Environmental Health Trust, has debunked a lawsuit filed by the CTIA, a wireless industry group representing AT&T and Verizon among others, to prevent San Francisco’s “Right to Know” ordinance from taking effect on October 25.  A hearing on the suit is set for October 20.
The cell phone disclosure law, the first of its kind in the U.S., requires retailers to display large, informational posters and hand out fact sheets explaining ways to reduce exposure to microwave radiation from cellphones.  The CTIA disagrees with the ordinance, calling it “inaccurate, misleading, controversial, unnecessarily alarmist,” and saying it violates carriers’ First Amendment right to free speech.
Dr. Davis commented:  “George Orwell must be writing the script for the CTIA!   According to them, it’s against the First Amendment for phone sellers to have to tell you about safety risks BEFORE you buy a phone, what they in fact tell you AFTER you’ve spent your money.  Fine-print warnings are provided in the packaging for cell phones, but are only AFTER you’ve paid for a phone.  Tiny text tells you that iPhones cannot be kept safely in the pocket when turned on or they can release more radiation than the FCC allows.  Meanwhile, Blackberry’s small print advises that pregnant women and teenagers avoid cell phone exposure to the abdomen.  I guess the rights to life, liberty and happiness, do not include the right to know about cell phone radiation, until and unless you’ve spent money on a phone.  As Stephen Colbert might say, ‘Truthiness is very expensive.’”

About Environmental Health Trust

Environmental Health Trust (EHT) educates individuals, health professionals and communities about controllable environmental health risks and policy changes needed to reduce those risks. Current multi-media projects include: local and national campaigns to ban smoking and asbestos; working with international physician and worker safety groups to warn about the risks of inappropriate use of diagnostic radiation and cell phones, promoting research and awareness of environmental causes of breast cancer, and building environmental wellness programs in Wyoming and Pennsylvania to address the environmental impacts of energy development, the built environment and radon. EHT was created with the goal of promoting health and preventing disease one person, one community and one nation at a time. Capitalizing on growing public interest in Dr. Devra Lee Davis’s three popular books, When Smoke Ran Like Water, a National Book Award Finalist, The Secret History of the War on Cancer, andDisconnect–The Truth about Cell Phone Radiation, What Industry Has Done to Hide It and How to Protect Your Family, as well as recent documentary films, the foundation’s website offers clear, science-based information to prevent environmentally based disease and promote health, for the general public, children, and health professionals. For more information about getting involved in the numerous special projects spearheaded by the EHT, please log on to www.ehtrust.org.

Contact:
Janet Vasquez
The Investor Relations Group
(212) 825-3210
jvasquez@investorrelationsgroup.com

 

Posted in Featured, Information, News | No Comments »

Canada reconsidering its stance on cell phone radiation

October 8th, 2011

Posted in Featured, Information, News | No Comments »

« Older Entries